Hmm.
I am sure it is possible to disable phpBB3 functions in order to make it look more simple.
But it is not possible to ramp up Dizkus to fill phpBB's footprint.
So... a choice has been made in full knowledge. Why haven't the features been chosen?
BTW, this is how Dizkus is presented on its homepage:
Dizkus, formerly pnForum, is a fully integrated forum module for the Zikula/Postnuke.
It uses smarty-based pnRendertemplates, the PostNuke-API and permission system.
so... the advantages are:
- fully integrated
- smarty/pnrender templates
- postnuke
API
...
then an "analysis is prominently displayed on the home page:
- Mostly written in JavaScript
- Mature, well-established codebase
- Increasing year-over-year development activity
- Few source code comments
Do you notice something?
Yes, there is no mention of anything that could appeal to the end-user
(also I don't see the appeal of "few code comments"? that's rather a bad thing, javascript is already difficult enough in itself).
The above text was taken from the project site
http://www.ohloh.net/p/dizkus, because Dizkus doesn't even have a sales site.
Then there's
http://code.zikula.org/dizkus, but there's even fewer information.
Not a single list of Dizkus' capabilities.
It is as if there was no interest in growing the userbase and getting more users.
Here is what phpBB3 can do:
http://www.phpbb.com/about/features/
"He who can do more can do less" (french proverb)
I don't want to belittle the technical achievement of coding Dizkus, which is a nice product for a different purpose than running a community on it.
But I do question the philosophy behind the choices being made.
edited by: manarak, datetimebrief