The term 'permalink' is nothing but a term. It's not a special tag, it's just a link.
When adding the title to the
URL, as I mentioned in the OP, and somehow there's a typo slipped in when posting. It'd be better to fix it. A typo in the title, thereby in the
URL, doesn't look professional.
Since the article is filed under an ID, and when having the ID always in the
URL: /News/1/Display/test.html
You can do these checks. Broken backlinks sucks.
For the category that can be put in the
URL of an article, sounds good. Adds a few keywords, but...
So, I'm starting a site, for computer techy stuff.. It's a small community, but it's growing..
I've got a few categories: Software, Operating Systems, Hardware.
My urls are looking like: /News/1/Operating-Systems/2/Windows-Vista-is-the-bomb/
Now my site really runs well, my userbase grows, and then there's the issue, that the category 'Operating Systems' should be split up in 3 sub-categories: Windows, *NIX, Mac.
The old articles would then become invalid, because the new article will be filed under Windows:
/News/1/Windows/2-2/Windows/Windows-Vista-is-the-bomb/
When looking at it, in a long-term, the extra features that are made, aren't their to be used on a site that is subject to change in everything. Categories can expand..
A site with 500 users with 1 posting a day in a category, like Operating Systems, will do fine. But for a growing community, where people doesn't give a rats-arse about Windows, can use for example, the RSS-feed for the *NIX category. But say these changes are made after 1 year, with 1 article a day, you break 365 backlinks.
I need a site that works, and a site that keeps working on older/archived stuff after changes that are made.
So, within .8 there's no room to grow, when making these kind of changes.
The position in the SERP are based on the PR and the SEO of the site itself. PR stands for PageRank, and 365 pages that would rank say 4, and after a change, an upgrade to the usability, which result in those Pages are invalid, will drop the popularity of the site. The complete site will drop in the results if 365 highly ranked Pages are gone.. Well, they aren't, but they moved permanent, which is a HTTP-header for: 301 Moved Permanent.
Steffen, your idea I've thought about of doing. In your case, the urls don't break, but you're duplicating content. Since 1 article will be shown whatever the &title= will be (Same as what is happening with each article on pn.com).
If you search on google for an article on PN.com, you'll see that the normal-urls rank higher then the shorturls-
URL. Why? well, that's because of the backlinks. The RSS-feed of pn.com outputs the normal-urls, so the incomming urls, which count for PR, are higher then the internal links using shorturls.
It basicly comes to this: Running a good site, and looking to all SE's guidelines for webmasters,
PN should think about what the results are when a site is subject to change/grow.
Do NOT duplicate content
Use 301 redirect if a page changed location, to keep PR
As for w3c compliancy, or on the issue: 'what specialists say', or on accessibility.. Fine with me, but for my needs, these things are a great miss. Looing at the webmaster guidelines, you basicly say: we don't care.