Hey all I am working on a new module and I wanted to know if I really have to have the adminapi fucntions, the reason I ask is that the module will have no configuration and the administration will be handled on a user by user basis through the permissions system so do I have to have this is it maditory??
Thanks
-SUNADMN
Forum Activity
- jmvaughn created topic »TagIt 3.0 for Zikula« 09:34 AM
- jmvaughn responded to »Shoutit for zikula 1.3?« 09:31 AM
- mdee responded to »Different page content under one template (tpl file) based on URL« 07:17 AM
- Guite responded to »Remove contents of nuke_sc_anticracker from Database« 01:30 AM
- espaan responded to »Categories disappear when editing ...« 08. Feb
- eledril responded to »How decrease zikula cpu usage« 08. Feb
- jmvaughn responded to »PN 0.764 to Zikula 1.1.2 (migration) Internal Server Error« 08. Feb
Zikula Blog
- Anatomy of Open Source Projects on Mar 07
- Continuous Review on Mar 01
- Not Invented Here on Feb 24
- How to Contribute Your Code at Github on Jan 13
- 10 Steps to Coding-Nirvana: Tips for Successful Module Writing on Nov 12
- Submitting Bug Report Tickets That Get Results on Aug 17
- Cozi Tricks #1: Syntax Highlighting on Aug 07
Login
do I have to have these??? (functions)
-
**unknown user**
- Rank: Softmore
- Registered: Mar 16, 2002
- Last visit: Oct 21, 2009
- Posts: 413
Posted: Feb 24, 2005 - 02:53 AM
-
**unknown user**
- Rank: Softmore
- Registered: Mar 16, 2002
- Last visit: Oct 21, 2009
- Posts: 379
Posted: Feb 24, 2005 - 02:57 AM
Sounds to me like you don't need it. I have it so that I have the link in the admin menu, so that I can get to it there if I want to, and so that, if I add stuff later configuration-wise I can get to it. However, if you change the variable in the version file saying it's got an admin option, then you're fine, I would think. :) -
**unknown user**
- Rank: Softmore
- Registered: Mar 16, 2002
- Last visit: Oct 21, 2009
- Posts: 413
Posted: Feb 24, 2005 - 03:03 AM
Groovy jedi that's what I thought but wanted to make sure before I messed things up.
Thanks
-SUNADMN -
- Rank: Developer
- Registered: Dec 31, 1969
- Last visit: Jun 01, 2010
- Posts: 6840
Posted: Feb 24, 2005 - 03:28 AM
Worst case scenario is you have to go back in and write the admin stuff after the fact, not likely to hurt anything.. I do like jedi on PrayerPost, pretty much the only thing in the Admin functions is to let me see it. I think I ended up with the remove function being the only admin power.
--
Home Page | Find on Facebook | Follow on Twitter
-
- Rank: Team Member
- Registered: Mar 18, 2002
- Last visit: Oct 21, 2009
- Posts: 6606
Posted: Feb 24, 2005 - 04:06 AM
For consistencies sake it may be worth keeping the modifyconfig/updateconfig functions. If your working from .750 example module then there's no point. But in the .760 version some new hook types have been added. These are modifyconfig/updateconfig hooks. These hooks allow additional options to be added to the modifyconfig page of a module by other modules.
Also where possible key the user API's consistently named; get to get an item, getall to get a set of items etc.
-Mark
--
Visit My homepage and Zikula themes. -
**unknown user**
- Rank: Softmore
- Registered: Mar 16, 2002
- Last visit: Oct 21, 2009
- Posts: 413
Posted: Feb 24, 2005 - 07:46 AM
Great guys thanks so much for the answers I will keep to the naming conventions in my development for sure, it seems to help with confucion on what does what.
Thanks
-SUNADMN
- Moderated by:
- Support
