Fork me on GitHub

DEBATE: Presentation of Commercial News  Bottom

Go to page [-1] 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5:

  • Quote

    First of all I never posted anything to any webvida website. I assume you have an explanation as to why you have mirrored copywritten material without consent? I have notified the owner of the 205.214.84.104 IP address block and the webmaster at envolution that you have stolen copywritten material and republished it without permission.


    I have not actually changed any of the content or removed any copyrights. All I have done is added my comment that was removed by the management. When they add my comment I will remove it. I will also remove it once it has served it's purpose of showing what a fool you are JRC.

    Quote

    More name calling huh?

    It appears thats all you are good at.


    Actually Shawn is quite good at a number of things, especially considering the fact that he stepped up and offered an enhanced theming system that changed forever the face of nuke sites.

    I ask again JRC:

    So what is it that you actually contribute to this community JRC, anything? Have you done anything? Can you answer this? No I thought not...

    --
    -Lobos
    Professional PHP Framework Services: Concept, Development and Deployment
  • All,

    The debate and poll were designed to get public opinion, not to act as the deciding mechanism. Unless there was a resounding "Keeps commercial posts on postnuke.com sites" both by comment and poll, the decision was always to split these off onto another sub/site. Both threads were taken into account. There is enough of a split so we are not prepared to do something which will has already been complained about en mass. Remember, we have tried other methods too such as modifying the navigator and adding commercial topic headers to news.

    MODERATION WARNING: Name calling and/or inflamatory posting is not allowed within PostNuke Community - desist or you will be banned from PostNuke.

    --
    Zikula Lead Developer
    Board Member of the Zikula Foundation
    Follow me on twitter.com/zikuladrak
  • AbraCadaver

    "zoombie zoombot"


    Is it my English again icon_redface , but shouldn't it be zombie wink icon_lol

    jrc joined 26th May and allready posted 4 times (in this tread) and critisized Postnuke.com news policy at envolution.com.

    That is a real contribution or just a troll, someone might say unjustified.
  • upaja

    AbraCadaver

    "zoombie zoombot"


    Is it my English again icon_redface , but shouldn't it be zombie wink icon_lol

    jrc joined 26th May and allready posted 4 times (in this tread) and critisized Postnuke.com news policy at envolution.com.

    That is a real contribution or just a troll, someone might say unjustified.


    I joined postnuke.com in Jan of 2004. The date you quoted is inserted the first time someone uses the forums.

    Also I would like you to show me where I critisized postnuke policy anywhere on any site...because I never have! I critisized Lobos and Abracadaver only in a review on envolution.com...and it turns out my initial review of them is very accurate.
  • Lobos

    Quote

    First of all I never posted anything to any webvida website. I assume you have an explanation as to why you have mirrored copywritten material without consent? I have notified the owner of the 205.214.84.104 IP address block and the webmaster at envolution that you have stolen copywritten material and republished it without permission.


    I have not actually changed any of the content or removed any copyrights. All I have done is added my comment that was removed by the management. When they add my comment I will remove it. I will also remove it once it has served it's purpose of showing what a fool you are JRC.

    Quote

    More name calling huh?

    It appears thats all you are good at.


    Actually Shawn is quite good at a number of things, especially considering the fact that he stepped up and offered an enhanced theming system that changed forever the face of nuke sites.

    I ask again JRC:

    So what is it that you actually contribute to this community JRC, anything? Have you done anything? Can you answer this? No I thought not...


    Just quoting Lobos so he cant come back and edit his words. Thanks for admitting you have republished copyright material without permission. Just because you have not changed anything does not give you the right to illegally republish content clearly prohibited from being republished.

    My contribution to the commuity Lobos is voting to clean up postnuke.com from overt commercial spam advertisments. So yes I can and did answer this.......too bad you think there is a requirement for being part of a community. That is one of the things that you do to poison a community from end users like me.
  • 59 137 registered users
    17 392 users who have logged in these forums
    10790 posted something on these forums

    total votes 62 icon_rolleyes

    Seems to me most of community :shock: don't care a bit about this :?
  • upaja


    59 137 registered users


    No mention of how many members are active. I bet the vast majority of these user accounts are unused and abandoned considering the most ever online at any given time was 173 or so back in June 2003 (according to the index page of the forums)

    upaja


    17 392 users who have logged in these forums


    This doesn't mean 17 392 people have actaully read each and every thread in these forums either.

    upaja


    10790 posted something on these forums


    I don't think this stat is really relevant. How many have read these forums and didn't register or login or post?

    upaja


    total votes 62 icon_rolleyes


    Seems to me most of community :shock: don't care a bit about this :?


    I don't believe you have the information to draw that conclusion.

    Hyperbole may sound real nice and all, but 62 active voting participants in any poll or survey online is good. Especially given the chances of being publically attacked if you disagree with those trying to keep their free advertising source is virtually 100%.
  • jrc

    Just quoting Lobos so he cant come back and edit his words. Thanks for admitting you have republished copyright material without permission. Just because you have not changed anything does not give you the right to illegally republish content clearly prohibited from being republished.


    I think I have every right to quote material in defence of my company.

    --
    -Lobos
    Professional PHP Framework Services: Concept, Development and Deployment
  • jrc


    I don't believe you have the information to draw that conclusion.


    You are right. From those figures you can draw what ever conclusion you like.

    100% of community accept commercial news

    51% community is against commercial news

    under 1% community accept commercial news (Even thinking all votes as yes)

    But it is 100% sure that Postnuke management has made a decision on this and 100% wont accept their decision. I can hope they have made the right decision for the community, what ever that community means.

    I wont be fooled on voting these pools ever I hope. It aint 100%.
  • drak

    All,

    The debate and poll were designed to get public opinion, not to act as the deciding mechanism. Unless there was a resounding "Keeps commercial posts on postnuke.com sites" both by comment and poll, the decision was always to split these off onto another sub/site........


    Drak, I appreciate the fact that you are taking the time to participate and foster the debate. However, where is a balanced view from the existing management team? Shouldn't the PN management team (I am referring to a unit which I firmly believe is non-existant) present a position, and call for input into that position rather than vise versa. You have effectively said "we want a community opinion on commercial posts and then we will present the management position".

    The call for public debates are a bit confusing in the sense, that if the debate doesn't go the way the management prefers then an oppositional position is taken regardless. Why bother asking the question in the first place?

    Where does it get us? Name calling, defensiveness, wasted energy. It sort of seems to me like we are so close to a sensible management model and yet we regress - 1 step forward 2 steps backward.

    Cheers
    namtrak
  • "warning! drive-by spammer alert!!"

    It's amazing to me how vocal, almost to the point of being abusive to others here, a very small few are that are in favor of this commercialization of postnuke, as has been seen in this thread, the last poll, and many other news items threads across the sites. But it's only a few people doing this bashing. Why?
    These people you are bashing are your best advertisement!

    These people you guys are bashing, members of the community and ALL those others that read this tit for tat crap going on will remember how you reacted long after the smoke has cleared.
    Word of mouth advertising is far better than any top billing on themes.postnuke.com

    Why isn't those that are against this speaking out? IMHO, it's because of this aggressive behavior by those few who DO want this to happen.

    Now I've got a few friends in these threads that I respect 100% but in this discussion I completely disagree with their comments and responses to others. A few excepts to make my point if I may...

    AbraCadaver

    ......PostNuke hasn't been in my top 20 referers for a while now....


    This may be true Shawn, but I respectfully doubt that.


    Lobos

    ...Why do I feel like the loser, why should I bother to help a community that doesn't help me?


    You didn't start out to help the community I'm sure. You started out like all of us, having fun with some free software called postnuke. You enjoyed what you were doing and went into business. Great. Giving back to this community some of your work for free, as Shawn and others have been doing for many years is a commendable thing surely, but this comment by you above is just plain nuts.
    You are in business, get to it guys. Word of mouth advertising and your own paid advertising at other venues is how you're going to get ahead.
    Contributing to this community and others, getting your name (and product) out there is how you'll succeed.

    But you're apparently fighting for a spot on the front page of a community website called postnuke that's been built by hundreds of users who came before you and gave their time for free over the years, for the sake of what? Beer money?

    Lobos this community has surely helped you, and me and countless 1000's of others many times in many ways over the years. The more you put into it, the more you will get back, this was the great thing about postnuke at one time. But this doesn't have to be the case. You are not being forced to make those themes. You could always go back to your day job.
    The best products need no advertising. They sell themselves.

    upaja

    ..Seems to me most of community don't care a bit about this


    Most of the community these days are new users who just want to get a site up, IMHO. They could care less about the politics of getting sales leads from the hits front page advertising at postnuke may or may not bring them.
    Of course, like many in these threads know quite well, those leads can be substantial.

    Postnuke is a world wide community and has always for the most part, been an open source community that "gave back" just because...
    They / we didn't give our time to the community looking for something in return we did /do it for the fun of it. If there are benefits to that? Great, enjoy.

    If you're looking for returns on your investment, get back to work and keep doing what you do so well and reap the benefits. Quit looking to ride on the backs of many that have come before you and worked their butts off for free just to make a few bucks.

    If you guys didn't have your heads so far up yur *sses, you might think about this another way, how can the community work from within to make it better for all concerned. But nooooo that's too easy huh?

    pnThemes -- Downloads section is a wasteland. Not only does literally no one use it, it sucks to promote your themes or whatever else you wanted to offer. The downloads module itself should have been revamped long ago to reflect it's users needs and has been all but ignored. Even postnuke the package is located in an area that is "non - postnuke" because this module sucks so bad.

    This is the fault of the management of this project for not listening to it's users and making changes that would benefit all of us. This is the fault of the community for not speaking up loud enough to be heard upstairs.

    The downloads area is only one example of many...

    You want to make money? Great. I like money too.
    But this is postnuke. If you don't know what that is, well then why are you doing anything for others here at all? What should be defined clearly is what postnuke is. The rest becomes a moot point if you have this in hand.
    We don't unfortunately, this is yet another fault of the management team. We have had one game after the next for too many years and these actions are now coming to bear it's fruits.

    Take that look of greed off of your face fellas, it's making a few of you look quite ugly. postnuke will run fine without any intervention of AutoTheme or "for profit" modules no one else can work on or innovate/advance over time as the code is encrypted.

    Take a look at the stats here on these sites, what you and others have been fighting over for far too long has and will continue to hurt this once great community.

    Many are still using postnuke, and they are registered pnUsers. They avoid these kinds of debates and controversy for a reason. It sucks.

    Taking a poll or two here on the forums where it's seen by far fewer people than a news item of the latest greatest from the labs of lobos is crazy. Wording it so as to be too confusing to make a rational choice is also, crazy.

    pnManagement has ignored this community for far too long and the results as we see here are not unexpected.

    It's YOUR community, but that doesn't entitle you to make money off of the backs of others. Go do it somewhere else. This is a community not a commercial product.

    For example, I have promoted Shawn's and Adam's sites on my site many times. I have never had a problem doing that. I am also quite sure others feel the same way. We are helping each other to get ahead this way. This is the idea of community support from a community oriented project, and that is a good thing.

    You want to "dabble" into the commercial world and make your income? More power to you. Do it on your own site, best of luck to you. When you come here you should be leaving your commercial aspirations at the door. postnuke is only your starting point, what you do with it once you get home is up to you.


    mhalbrook

    I really love that the people voiting no are not very vocal on Backing Up their reasons for doing so, while the yeses do.


    Howdayuhlikemenow bub? http://forums.postnuke.com/modules/PNphpBB2/templates/PNTheme/posticons/pnFORUM/image_13.gif icon_rolleyes http://forums.postnuke.com/modules/PNphpBB2/templates/PNTheme/posticons/pnFORUM/image_13.gif
  • Infopro, you have brought up some good points, you have been absent for quite some time and fail as do a few regular negative people around here, to recognize the many changes that have occured. This thread has become way off topic. The debate was held, and concluded. For the sake of repetition, let me repeat:

    This debate and poll was used to gather information (in conjunction with the last). The commercial debate has been running for several months and we have tried various methods of dealing with this matter. It is still clear that a number of users larger than we are prepared to ignore, dislike even seeing commercial news postings. Unless there was a resounding acceptance of commercial posts on the main postnuke.com sites, the decison would not have been different. Commercial posts will be moved to a new sub/site.

    This debate has come to a close and I thank everyone for their contribution.

    --
    Zikula Lead Developer
    Board Member of the Zikula Foundation
    Follow me on twitter.com/zikuladrak

Go to page [-1] 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5:

  • 0 users

This list is based on users active over the last 60 minutes.