Fork me on GitHub

[OT]: Postnuke vs PHP nuke thread on usenet  Bottom

  • I was going throught the newsgroups and found a thread where a guy was touting Postnuke over PHPNuke. Although I don't wan't to start a flame war, this guy claims Postnuke is more secure than PHPNuke because it's "certified" by IBM as secure. (At least that's the way I read it).

    Although I haven't had any security problems, I assume that Postnuke hasn't been certified by IBM and the usenet post is misleading. Are there any developers that can give any comments on how secure Postnuke really is?

    You can view the post here: http://groups.google…ni-berlin.de&rnum=4

    It's in a motorcycle group of all places....

    Grant
  • Grant,

    Here's the real story I belive the person if referring too. It's IBM server proven rather than certified.

    The architecture of PN is aimed at making things more secure by providing API's for developers to get clean input (pnVarCleanFromInput), store data in the DB (pnVarPrepForStore) etc. These API's ensure the integrity of information being supplied to the application. To this we add the PN coding standards. These document the steps that developers should take to write secure code.

    Of course developers still have to follow these and there have been security issues found even in the core code as well as a number of modules. So a further piece in the puzzle is response to security issues. PN's true open source nature - CVS etc. means that fixes can be discovered and distributed as quickly as possible.

    -Mark

    --
    Visit My homepage and Zikula themes.

This list is based on users active over the last 60 minutes.